Cape Verde vs Kyrgyzstan: Binding coverage, primary products
Cape Verde
99.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
99.8%
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
28th
Kyrgyzstan rank
28th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Cape Verde
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 99.8% against 99.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 158 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.9% | 99.9% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 99.9% | 99.9% | 0.0% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 99.8% | 99.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Cape Verde or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cape Verde, at 99.8% against 99.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Cape Verde and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Cape Verde and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Cape Verde ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).