Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Cambodia or Hong Kong, China?

Cambodia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2022.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Hong Kong, China?

12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cambodia vs Hong Kong, China: Binding coverage, primary products

Cambodia

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong, China

0.0%

in 2022

Cambodia rank

60th

Hong Kong, China rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Cambodia
Hong Kong, China

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 60th and Hong Kong, China ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cambodia	Hong Kong, China	Difference	Ahead
2000s	100.0%	87.1%	12.9%	Cambodia
2010s	100.0%	88.3%	11.7%	Cambodia
2020s	66.6%	59.2%	7.4%	Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Cambodia or Hong Kong, China?: Cambodia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Cambodia and Hong Kong, China?: 0.0%, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Hong Kong, China?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Cambodia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Cambodia ranks 60th and Hong Kong, China ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Hong Kong, China: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/cambodia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/cambodia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Cambodia vs Hong Kong, China: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).