Chad vs Namibia: Binding coverage, primary products
Chad
0.0%
in 2022
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Chad rank
60th
Namibia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Chad
- Namibia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.4% | 86.3% | 32.0% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 53.3% | 82.3% | 29.0% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Chad or Namibia?
- Chad, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Chad and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Chad ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).