Congo vs Croatia: Binding coverage, primary products
Congo
0.0%
in 2022
Croatia
0.0%
in 2022
Congo rank
60th
Croatia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Congo
- Croatia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Croatia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 60th and Croatia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.4% | 0.0% | 54.4% | Congo |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 60.0% | 7.3% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Congo or Croatia?
- Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Croatia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Congo and Croatia?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Congo ranks 60th and Croatia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).