Congo vs Hong Kong: Binding coverage, primary products
Congo
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2022
Congo rank
60th
Hong Kong rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Congo
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 60th and Hong Kong ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.5% | 87.4% | 31.9% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 54.4% | 87.1% | 32.7% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 88.3% | 35.6% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Congo or Hong Kong?
- Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Congo and Hong Kong?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hong Kong?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Hong Kong rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Congo ranks 60th and Hong Kong ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).