Congo vs Macao: Binding coverage, primary products
Congo
0.0%
in 2022
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Congo rank
60th
Macao rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Congo
- Macao
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Macao ahead.
Congo ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.5% | 61.0% | 5.6% | Macao |
| 2000s | 54.4% | 60.1% | 5.7% | Macao |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 54.8% | 2.0% | Macao |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Congo or Macao?
- Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Congo and Macao?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Macao?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Macao rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Congo ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).