Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Costa Rica or Guinea-Bissau?

Costa Rica, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2022.

How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?

19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Binding coverage, primary products

Costa Rica

0.0%

in 2022

Guinea-Bissau

0.0%

in 2022

Costa Rica rank

60th

Guinea-Bissau rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Costa Rica
Guinea-Bissau

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Guinea-Bissau	Difference	Ahead
2000s	100.0%	96.4%	3.6%	Costa Rica
2010s	100.0%	96.5%	3.5%	Costa Rica
2020s	66.6%	64.4%	2.2%	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Costa Rica or Guinea-Bissau?: Costa Rica, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?: 0.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Costa Rica ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/costa-rica/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/costa-rica/guinea-bissau/">Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).