Costa Rica vs Namibia: Binding coverage, primary products
Costa Rica
0.0%
in 2022
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
60th
Namibia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Costa Rica
- Namibia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 86.3% | 13.7% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 81.5% | 18.4% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 53.7% | 12.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Costa Rica or Namibia?
- Costa Rica, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Namibia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Costa Rica ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).