Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Binding coverage, primary products
Croatia
0.0%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau
0.0%
in 2022
Croatia rank
60th
Guinea-Bissau rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Croatia
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Croatia ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 96.4% | 96.4% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 62.5% | 96.5% | 34.0% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 64.4% | 2.2% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
- Croatia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Croatia ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).