Cuba vs Myanmar: Binding coverage, primary products
Cuba
58.4%
in 2022
Myanmar
58.5%
in 2022
Cuba rank
54th
Myanmar rank
53rd
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Cuba
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 58.5% against 58.4% in Cuba, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 54th and Myanmar ranks 53rd of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.8% | 60.5% | 1.3% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 61.1% | 60.6% | 0.5% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 59.0% | 58.6% | 0.4% | Cuba |
| 2020s | 58.4% | 58.5% | 0.1% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Cuba or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 58.5% against 58.4% in Cuba as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Cuba and Myanmar?
- 0.1%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Myanmar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Myanmar rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Cuba ranks 54th and Myanmar ranks 53rd of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).