Cyprus vs South Africa: Binding coverage, primary products
Cyprus
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Cyprus rank
60th
South Africa rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Cyprus
- South Africa
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1996 it was South Africa ahead.
Cyprus ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 87.2% | 87.2% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 66.7% | 86.4% | 19.8% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 81.3% | 18.7% | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 53.7% | 12.9% | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Cyprus or South Africa?
- Cyprus, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Cyprus and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and South Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Cyprus and South Africa rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Cyprus ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).