Ecuador vs Singapore: Binding coverage, primary products
Ecuador
93.5%
in 2022
Singapore
85.6%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
38th
Singapore rank
41st
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Ecuador
- Singapore
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 93.5% against 85.6% in Singapore, a difference of 7.9%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 38th and Singapore ranks 41st of 158 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.1% | 83.8% | 13.3% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 96.9% | 83.8% | 13.2% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 94.3% | 85.4% | 8.9% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 93.5% | 85.6% | 7.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Ecuador or Singapore?
- Ecuador, at 93.5% against 85.6% in Singapore as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Ecuador and Singapore?
- 7.9%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Singapore rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Ecuador ranks 38th and Singapore ranks 41st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).