Gambia vs Macao: Binding coverage, primary products
Gambia
0.0%
in 2022
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Gambia rank
60th
Macao rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Gambia
- Macao
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Macao ahead.
Gambia ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.2% | 59.7% | 4.5% | Macao |
| 2010s | 53.8% | 54.9% | 1.1% | Macao |
| 2020s | 35.4% | 34.9% | 0.5% | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Gambia or Macao?
- Gambia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Gambia and Macao?
- 0.0%, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Macao?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Gambia and Macao rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Gambia ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).