Grenada vs Trinidad and Tobago: Binding coverage, primary products
Grenada
100.0%
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2022
Grenada rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Grenada
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 158 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Grenada or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Grenada, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.0%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Grenada ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).