Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Binding coverage, primary products
Guinea-Bissau
0.0%
in 2022
Lesotho
0.0%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau rank
60th
Lesotho rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Lesotho
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th and Lesotho ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.4% | 100.0% | 3.6% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 100.0% | 3.5% | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 64.4% | 66.6% | 2.2% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Guinea-Bissau or Lesotho?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Lesotho as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
- 0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th and Lesotho ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).