Guinea-Bissau vs Liechtenstein: Binding coverage, primary products
Guinea-Bissau
0.0%
in 2022
Liechtenstein
0.0%
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau rank
60th
Liechtenstein rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th and Liechtenstein ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 96.6% | 0.0% | 96.6% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 96.7% | 0.0% | 96.7% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Guinea-Bissau or Liechtenstein?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Liechtenstein as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Guinea-Bissau and Liechtenstein?
- 0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Liechtenstein?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Liechtenstein rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th and Liechtenstein ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).