What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand?

0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand?

19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs New Zealand: Binding coverage, primary products

Guinea-Bissau

0.0%

in 2022

New Zealand

0.0%

in 2022

Guinea-Bissau rank

60th

New Zealand rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Guinea-Bissau
New Zealand

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 19 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 158 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea-Bissau	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
2000s	96.4%	100.0%	3.6%	New Zealand
2010s	96.5%	99.9%	3.5%	New Zealand
2020s	64.4%	66.6%	2.2%	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Guinea-Bissau or New Zealand?: Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand?: 0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs New Zealand: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/guinea-bissau/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/guinea-bissau/new-zealand/">Guinea-Bissau vs New Zealand: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).