Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong (China) or Japan?

Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Japan as of 2022.

What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong (China) and Japan?

0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Japan?

27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong (China) vs Japan: Binding coverage, primary products

Hong Kong (China)

0.0%

in 2022

Japan

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong (China) rank

60th

Japan rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Hong Kong (China)
Japan

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Japan, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Japan ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong (China)	Japan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	87.3%	98.4%	11.1%	Japan
2000s	87.1%	98.4%	11.3%	Japan
2010s	88.6%	98.5%	9.9%	Japan
2020s	59.2%	65.7%	6.5%	Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong (China) or Japan?: Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Japan as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong (China) and Japan?: 0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Japan?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Japan rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Japan ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Japan: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/japan/">Hong Kong (China) vs Japan: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).