Hong Kong vs Kenya: Binding coverage, primary products
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2022
Kenya
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong rank
60th
Kenya rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Hong Kong
- Kenya
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 60th and Kenya ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.4% | 59.4% | 28.0% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 87.1% | 58.9% | 28.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 88.6% | 58.6% | 30.0% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 59.2% | 39.4% | 19.8% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong or Kenya?
- Hong Kong, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Kenya as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong and Kenya?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Kenya?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong and Kenya rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Hong Kong ranks 60th and Kenya ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).