Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong (China) or Latvia?

Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.

What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong (China) and Latvia?

0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Latvia?

20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong (China) vs Latvia: Binding coverage, primary products

Hong Kong (China)

0.0%

in 2022

Latvia

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong (China) rank

60th

Latvia rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Hong Kong (China)
Latvia

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Hong Kong (China) ahead.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong (China)	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	87.1%	85.7%	1.4%	Hong Kong (China)
2010s	88.6%	100.0%	11.4%	Latvia
2020s	59.2%	66.6%	7.4%	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong (China) or Latvia?: Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong (China) and Latvia?: 0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Latvia?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Latvia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Latvia: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong (China) vs Latvia: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).