Hong Kong vs Oman: Binding coverage, primary products
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2022
Oman
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong rank
60th
Oman rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Hong Kong
- Oman
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Oman, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 60th and Oman ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.1% | 100.0% | 12.9% | Oman |
| 2010s | 88.9% | 100.0% | 11.1% | Oman |
| 2020s | 59.2% | 66.6% | 7.4% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong or Oman?
- Hong Kong, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Oman as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong and Oman?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Oman?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong and Oman rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Hong Kong ranks 60th and Oman ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).