Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong (China) or Poland?

Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland as of 2022.

What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong (China) and Poland?

0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Poland?

27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong (China) vs Poland: Binding coverage, primary products

Hong Kong (China)

0.0%

in 2022

Poland

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong (China) rank

60th

Poland rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Hong Kong (China)
Poland

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong (China) ahead.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Poland ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong (China)	Poland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	87.3%	0.0%	87.3%	Hong Kong (China)
2000s	87.1%	60.0%	27.1%	Hong Kong (China)
2010s	88.6%	100.0%	11.4%	Poland
2020s	59.2%	66.6%	7.4%	Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Hong Kong (China) or Poland?: Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Hong Kong (China) and Poland?: 0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Poland?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Poland rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Poland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Poland: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/poland/">Hong Kong (China) vs Poland: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).