Iceland vs Malaysia: Binding coverage, primary products
Iceland
0.0%
in 2022
Malaysia
0.0%
in 2022
Iceland rank
60th
Malaysia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Iceland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 60th and Malaysia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.2% | 84.2% | 11.9% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 96.3% | 83.7% | 12.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 96.8% | 82.0% | 14.8% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 48.4% | 40.8% | 7.7% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Iceland or Malaysia?
- Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Malaysia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Iceland and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malaysia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Malaysia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Iceland ranks 60th and Malaysia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).