Jordan vs Samoa: Binding coverage, primary products
Jordan
99.8%
in 2022
Samoa
99.8%
in 2020
Jordan rank
28th
Samoa rank
28th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Jordan
- Samoa
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 99.8% against 99.8% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 28th and Samoa ranks 28th of 158 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 99.9% | 99.9% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 99.8% | 99.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Jordan or Samoa?
- Jordan, at 99.8% against 99.8% in Samoa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Jordan and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Samoa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and Samoa rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Jordan ranks 28th and Samoa ranks 28th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).