Kyrgyzstan vs Samoa: Binding coverage, primary products

Kyrgyzstan
99.8%
in 2021
Samoa
99.8%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
28th
Samoa rank
28th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Samoa
020406080100200020102021

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 99.8% against 99.8% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th and Samoa ranks 28th of 158 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Samoa Difference Ahead
2010s 99.9% 99.9% 0.0% Samoa
2020s 99.8% 99.8% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Kyrgyzstan or Samoa?
Kyrgyzstan, at 99.8% against 99.8% in Samoa as of 2021.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Kyrgyzstan and Samoa?
0.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Samoa?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Samoa rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th and Samoa ranks 28th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).