Latvia vs Nicaragua: Binding coverage, primary products
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Nicaragua
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia rank
60th
Nicaragua rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 60th and Nicaragua ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.7% | 100.0% | 14.3% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 66.6% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Nicaragua as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Latvia ranks 60th and Nicaragua ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).