Latvia vs South Africa: Binding coverage, primary products
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia rank
60th
South Africa rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Latvia
- South Africa
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Africa ahead.
Latvia ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.7% | 86.3% | 0.6% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 81.3% | 18.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 53.7% | 12.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Latvia or South Africa?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Latvia and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Africa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and South Africa rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Latvia ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).