Liechtenstein vs South Africa: Binding coverage, primary products
Liechtenstein
0.0%
in 2021
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Liechtenstein rank
60th
South Africa rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Liechtenstein
- South Africa
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 81.0% | 81.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 80.5% | 80.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Liechtenstein or South Africa?
- Liechtenstein, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Liechtenstein and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and South Africa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Liechtenstein and South Africa rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Liechtenstein ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).