Lithuania vs Macao: Binding coverage, primary products
Lithuania
0.0%
in 2022
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Lithuania rank
60th
Macao rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Lithuania
- Macao
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Macao ahead.
Lithuania ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.0% | 59.9% | 15.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 53.4% | 46.5% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 34.9% | 31.7% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Lithuania or Macao?
- Lithuania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Lithuania and Macao?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Macao?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Macao rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Lithuania ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).