Lithuania vs Nepal: Binding coverage, primary products
Lithuania
0.0%
in 2022
Nepal
0.0%
in 2022
Lithuania rank
60th
Nepal rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Lithuania
- Nepal
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Nepal, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 99.6% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.5% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 66.3% | 0.3% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Lithuania or Nepal?
- Lithuania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Nepal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Lithuania and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nepal?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Nepal rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Lithuania ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).