Macao vs Montenegro: Binding coverage, primary products
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Montenegro
0.0%
in 2022
Macao rank
60th
Montenegro rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Macao
- Montenegro
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Macao ranks 60th and Montenegro ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.0% | 100.0% | 48.0% | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 34.9% | 66.6% | 31.7% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Macao or Montenegro?
- Macao, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Montenegro as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Macao and Montenegro?
- 0.0%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Montenegro?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Macao and Montenegro rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Macao ranks 60th and Montenegro ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).