Macao vs Mozambique: Binding coverage, primary products
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Mozambique
52.9%
in 2021
Macao rank
60th
Mozambique rank
59th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Macao
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 52.9% against 0.0% in Macao, a difference of 52.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 59th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.0% | 54.7% | 6.3% | Macao |
| 2000s | 60.1% | 54.4% | 5.7% | Macao |
| 2010s | 54.4% | 53.5% | 0.9% | Macao |
| 2020s | 52.4% | 52.9% | 0.5% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Macao or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 52.9% against 0.0% in Macao as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Macao and Mozambique?
- 52.9%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
- How do Macao and Mozambique rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Macao ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 59th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).