Macau, China vs South Africa: Binding coverage, primary products

Macau, China
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Macau, China rank
60th
South Africa rank
60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

  • Macau, China
  • South Africa
020406080199620092022

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 61.0% 87.2% 26.1% South Africa
2000s 60.2% 86.5% 26.3% South Africa
2010s 53.4% 81.3% 27.8% South Africa
2020s 34.9% 53.7% 18.7% South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Macau, China or South Africa?
Macau, China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Macau, China and South Africa?
0.0%, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
How do Macau, China and South Africa rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
Macau, China ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs South Africa: Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/macao-sar-china/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/macao-sar-china/south-africa/">Macau, China vs South Africa: Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).