Macao vs Uganda: Binding coverage, primary products
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Uganda
0.0%
in 2022
Macao rank
60th
Uganda rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Macao
- Uganda
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.2% | 57.0% | 3.1% | Macao |
| 2010s | 53.6% | 55.0% | 1.5% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 34.9% | 36.6% | 1.7% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Macao or Uganda?
- Macao, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Macao and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Uganda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Macao and Uganda rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Macao ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).