Malawi vs Philippines: Binding coverage, primary products
Malawi
68.8%
in 2021
Philippines
65.7%
in 2022
Malawi rank
49th
Philippines rank
50th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Malawi
- Philippines
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 68.8% against 65.7% in Philippines, a difference of 3.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.
Malawi ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 50th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.5% | 72.2% | 6.7% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 65.8% | 70.5% | 4.6% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 67.1% | 66.7% | 0.3% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 68.8% | 65.7% | 3.1% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Malawi or Philippines?
- Malawi, at 68.8% against 65.7% in Philippines as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Malawi and Philippines?
- 3.1%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Philippines?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Malawi and Philippines rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Malawi ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 50th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).