Malawi vs Tunisia: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Malawi
68.8%
in 2021
Tunisia
63.1%
in 2016
Malawi rank
49th
Tunisia rank
51st
Binding coverage, primary products (%) over time
- Malawi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 68.8% against 63.1% in Tunisia, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Tunisia ahead.
Malawi ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.5% | 67.7% | 2.2% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 65.8% | 66.6% | 0.8% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 66.8% | 64.1% | 2.7% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Malawi or Tunisia?
- Malawi, at 68.8% against 63.1% in Tunisia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Malawi and Tunisia?
- 5.7%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2016.
- How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Malawi ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).