Malta vs New Zealand: Binding coverage, primary products
Malta
0.0%
in 2022
New Zealand
0.0%
in 2022
Malta rank
60th
New Zealand rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Malta
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1997 it was New Zealand ahead.
Malta ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 66.7% | 100.0% | 33.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.9% | 0.0% | Malta |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 66.6% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Malta or New Zealand?
- Malta, at 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Malta and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Malta ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).