Mauritius vs Zambia: Binding coverage, primary products
Mauritius
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
Mauritius rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Mauritius
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.8% | 57.4% | 2.6% | Zambia |
| 2000s | 54.3% | 56.2% | 2.0% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 54.3% | 1.6% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 35.3% | 36.3% | 1.0% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Mauritius or Zambia?
- Mauritius, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Mauritius and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Mauritius ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).