Mongolia vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, primary products
Mongolia
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Mongolia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 54.5% | 45.5% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 52.9% | 47.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 35.2% | 31.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Mongolia or Tanzania?
- Mongolia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Mongolia and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tanzania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Mongolia and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Mongolia ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).