Mozambique vs Namibia: Binding coverage, primary products
Mozambique
52.9%
in 2021
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Mozambique rank
59th
Namibia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Mozambique
- Namibia
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 52.9% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 52.9%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 59th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.4% | 86.3% | 31.9% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 53.5% | 82.0% | 28.5% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 80.5% | 27.6% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Mozambique or Namibia?
- Mozambique, at 52.9% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Mozambique and Namibia?
- 52.9%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Mozambique and Namibia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Mozambique ranks 59th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).