Mozambique vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, primary products
Mozambique
52.9%
in 2021
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Mozambique rank
59th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Mozambique
- Tanzania
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 52.9% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 52.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Tanzania ahead.
Mozambique ranks 59th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.7% | 55.5% | 0.7% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 54.2% | 54.3% | 0.2% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 53.5% | 52.8% | 0.7% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 52.9% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Mozambique or Tanzania?
- Mozambique, at 52.9% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Mozambique and Tanzania?
- 52.9%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
- How do Mozambique and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Mozambique ranks 59th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).