New Zealand vs Rwanda: Binding coverage, primary products
New Zealand
0.0%
in 2022
Rwanda
0.0%
in 2022
New Zealand rank
60th
Rwanda rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- New Zealand
- Rwanda
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 99.9% | 100.0% | 0.0% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 66.6% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, New Zealand or Rwanda?
- New Zealand, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- New Zealand ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).