New Zealand vs Uganda: Binding coverage, primary products
New Zealand
0.0%
in 2022
Uganda
0.0%
in 2022
New Zealand rank
60th
Uganda rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- New Zealand
- Uganda
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 57.0% | 42.9% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 99.9% | 55.0% | 44.9% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 36.6% | 30.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, New Zealand or Uganda?
- New Zealand, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between New Zealand and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do New Zealand and Uganda rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- New Zealand ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).