North Macedonia vs Rwanda: Binding coverage, primary products
North Macedonia
0.0%
in 2022
Rwanda
0.0%
in 2022
North Macedonia rank
60th
Rwanda rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- North Macedonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 66.6% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, North Macedonia or Rwanda?
- North Macedonia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do North Macedonia and Rwanda rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- North Macedonia ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).