Norway vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, primary products
Norway
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Norway rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Norway
- Tanzania
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 55.5% | 44.5% | Norway |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 54.5% | 45.5% | Norway |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 52.6% | 47.3% | Norway |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 35.2% | 31.4% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Norway or Tanzania?
- Norway, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Norway and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tanzania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Norway and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Norway ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).