Philippines vs Tunisia: Binding coverage, primary products
Philippines
65.7%
in 2022
Tunisia
63.1%
in 2016
Philippines rank
50th
Tunisia rank
51st
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Philippines
- Tunisia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 65.7% against 63.1% in Tunisia, a difference of 2.6%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 50th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 158 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.4% | 67.6% | 4.8% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 70.1% | 66.7% | 3.4% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 66.9% | 64.1% | 2.9% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Philippines or Tunisia?
- Philippines, at 65.7% against 63.1% in Tunisia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Philippines and Tunisia?
- 2.6%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tunisia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2016.
- How do Philippines and Tunisia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Philippines ranks 50th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).