Philippines vs Zimbabwe: Binding coverage, primary products
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Philippines
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 69.2% against 65.7% in Philippines, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.2% | 66.4% | 5.8% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 71.6% | 66.1% | 5.4% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 67.2% | 67.1% | 0.1% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 65.7% | 69.2% | 3.5% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Philippines or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 69.2% against 65.7% in Philippines as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Philippines and Zimbabwe?
- 3.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Philippines and Zimbabwe rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Philippines ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).