Qatar vs Solomon Islands: Binding coverage, primary products
Qatar
0.0%
in 2022
Solomon Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Qatar rank
60th
Solomon Islands rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Qatar
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 60th and Solomon Islands ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 66.6% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Qatar or Solomon Islands?
- Qatar, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Qatar and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Solomon Islands?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Qatar and Solomon Islands rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Qatar ranks 60th and Solomon Islands ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).