Qatar vs Zambia: Binding coverage, primary products

Qatar
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
Qatar rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

  • Qatar
  • Zambia
020406080100199720092022

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 56.2% 43.8% Qatar
2010s 100.0% 54.3% 45.7% Qatar
2020s 66.6% 36.3% 30.3% Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Qatar or Zambia?
Qatar, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Qatar and Zambia?
0.0%, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
How do Qatar and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
Qatar ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).