Slovenia vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, primary products
Slovenia
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Slovenia rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Slovenia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tanzania ahead.
Slovenia ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.3% | 54.3% | 29.0% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 52.6% | 47.3% | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 35.2% | 31.4% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Slovenia or Tanzania?
- Slovenia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Slovenia and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Tanzania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Slovenia and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Slovenia ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).